Weblog
Saturday, 26 April 2008
-
Have you heard about the dangers of using NuvaRing?
Most rational human beings understand there are dangers in most every new technology, especially in the medical profession. That doesn't mean that a deep pockets, class action suit is warranted.
Lawyers who fish on Xanga for class action claimants are lower than whale shit on the bottom of the sea. And I know a thing or two about fishing and bottom feeding--I'm a fish! These lawyers are the modern day equivilent of ambulance chasers-they're virtual ambulance chancers. Too lazy to chase the real thing Jim???
As a class action and trial attorney, Mr. Sokolove, (the question blogger) you should know exactly what I'm talking about.
I don't know what's more disappointing, a preditory lawyer or an apathetic internet host allowing such blatant self interest in leiu of meaningful dialogue.
You are CHUM!
The Fighting Fish "Oy!"
I just answered this Featured Question, you can answer it too!
Wednesday, 23 April 2008
-
Re-post from January 29, 2008
Robby Robbins Regret
Robby Robbins just stood there alone wondering why
While shaking his head as a tear filled his eye
What is the TRUTH, about all that’s not clear
In this quaint little town where I’ve lived for a year
He wondered and pondered about how it could be
That so many things were not what they seemed
Why citizens on committees need politic and lie
Why the policemen on duty do not even try
Why rednecks with pickups tear off their exhausts
Why realtors and lenders try ripping you off
Why contractors are lazy and remarkably inept
Why the trailer lined streets are trashy and unkept
Why progress is thwarted with such vigor and vim
As welfare and poverty continue settling in
What have I done? Robby Robbins demanded
Have I made a mistake, am I being reprimanded?
There MUST be a reason for these lies and deceit
He reasoned to himself with a sense of defeat
I thought that I left all this madness behind
When I left the big city for simplicity to find
Surely these folks in this small little burb
Are better then that and above acting absurd.
You see....
Robby Robbins had hoped that here was not thereAnd his duty and commitment would be met with some care
From the little towns people that he thought would be kinder
But the backbiting lackluster was a steadfast reminder
That no matter how far you move from the city
Acts of self-interest are common and shitty
Trustworthiness, reliance, duty, honor and care
Are all virtuous notions that no longer are there
Except for an occasional chap, who by chance
Will try giving small towns people another fair chance
But people are people no matter your town
And the moral of this story—don’t let your guard down!
Expectations misplaced of a neighborly concern
Are a sure disappointment and your likely return
So, be true to your self and never forget
That acts of good faith that have no regret
Are made by those persons who decidedly labor
For a purpose much greater than a rural town neighbor
And if your purpose to give is not philanthropic
Skip the small town and move to the tropics.
You can relax in the sun and breathe the fresh air
And save your poor feelings from hurt and despair.
If you think Robby’s troubles are not common and true
Robby Robbins has a story of regret just for you.
Saturday, 09 February 2008
-
California Liberals in Berkeley Outlaw the Marines
In an unfathomable act, the Berkeley, CA City Council approved a measure urging Marine Recruiters to leave their town sparking off protests and demonstrations against the Marines. As if the unconstitutional and illegal legislation wasn't enough, the City Council urged the community to actively impede the efforts of any military recruiting office.The headline news story is featured on CNN and can be read at the following link: http://www.cnn.com/2008/US/02/07/berkeley.protests/index.htmlThe Fighting Fish gloves up...
No one has any greater respect than I do for our First Amendment right to free speech. In fact, I believe in those rights so much, that I chose to proudly volunteer to defend our country with eight years of service in the US Marines. And like every Marine before me, I was recruited.
In conflict and in peace time, the Marine Corps has served with courage, distinction, and humanitarianism. Whether one agrees with war or not, the individuals called to serve in defense of our country and our way of life should be given the honor and respect due for their willingness to make such a sacrifice.
But right now in Berkeley, the famously liberal college town in California (which last I checked was still part of the UNITED STATES), has taken aim at the US Marines. Protesters entrenched outside the Marine Recruiting Office are demonstrating against the presence of the Marines and letting them know in no uncertain terms they are not welcome.
The Marines are undeniably the toughest fighting force in the world. Perhaps Berkeley should have prepared for this fight by first taking on a less formidable force like the Air Force. I doubt Berkeley is up to the challenge.
The protesters are rightfully exercising their right to freedom of speech. The protesters themselves are not the issue. What is the issue is how the Berkeley City Council is using taxpayer dollars to make policy that really denigrates the military, and specifically the Marines. The protesters' demonstrations were urged by the city council to show support for the council's measure urging Marine recruiters to leave their downtown office.
Yes, you read it correctly. A local city government is propagating demonstrations to support their illegal resolution to rid their community of military recruiters.
The diminutive city of Berkeley has decided that its local governing body has the right to abuse its power by passing legislation banning recruiting activities by the Marine Corps--a department of the US Government. In fact, the council went so far as to announce that if the recruiters stay, they do so as "uninvited and unwelcome intruders". So what's the message? "Thanks for defending our freedom you scum sucking swine--please leave"
However, attacking the Marine Corps and legislating against the national government's right to recruit wasn't enough. The Berkeley City Council publicly announced that it encourages and applauds residents and organizations to "volunteer to impede, passively or actively, by nonviolent means, the work of any military recruiting office located in the City of Berkeley".
What the fu** is wrong with these people?!
First, their emboldened city council tries to make recruiting illegal. Then it encourages its citizens to actively impede the recruiting efforts of our armed forces? The Berkeley City Council has clearly overstepped its authority. It is overtly promoting national dissent which equates to nothing short of condoning domestic terrorism.
Isn't the punishment for treason death?
Let me be clear, there is nothing wrong with protesting war--it's an ugly business. The protection we have as US citizens under the First Amendment gives us that right. Protests however, should not be socially disruptive or threaten the security and safety of others. I'm not saying the Berkeley's actions are--yet--I'm simply building to a point.
Protests are a right of individual, legal citizens. The rights provided under the amendments to the US Constitution were not formed as a means to give local governing bodies the authority to act in defiance of our Federal Government, and certainly not as a political platform to encourage national dissention. And if you are not a naturalized citizen--shut up and go home--legally you have no voice.
The response of Washington lawmakers threatening to take back more than $2 million of federal funding to the city as well as money designated for the University of California-Berkeley was a decisive and proportional response. Bravo to them!
I think these people in Berkeley smoked too much marijuana in the 60's. It has obviously stifled their ability for rational thought. Do they not know the decision to declare war is made by the Congress, not the military? For crying out loud, even the illegal aliens know that. If the Berkeley residents are against war, then fine, focus your attention to those responsible for getting us there in the first place, congress, not the men and women called to defend the actions of our government.
It's obvious that the prolonged use of hallucinogens and psychotropic drugs has clearly blinded the Berkeley bunch to the great paradox they construct. How can any clear minded American decidedly abolish the efforts of the military which provides and defends their very entitlement of freedom? It doesn't even make sense.
The antics of the unfortunate and unloved generation in Berkeley are misguided and tragic. If the 9/11 terrorists had included Berkeley on their list of targets I assure you it would have awoken these sanctimonious as*holes from their dissident haze and they would suddenly have a use for the military. These are clearly the type of people who openly protest the police yet are the first to call 911 the minute their latte is missing--they're hypocrites.
Not one of them probably stopped to ask: If the recruiting efforts of the military are thwarted, how will America continue to defend itself from threats of terrorism and maintain our humanitarian support abroad, which protects other peoples from oppression and atrocity? The answer is we can't. Perhaps they propose a global love fest. We can all wear flowers in our hair and sing Kumbaya. Certainly nothing will break the will of a terrorist faster than a corsage and a hug.
They also don't realize that thwarting recruiting efforts puts our active duty soldiers at greater risk. If the military is not replacing its existing fighting men and women, then those wearied by combat must stay. Who will replace those killed in action if recruiting is not generating replacements? If reinforcements are not available, the loss of troop numbers and battle fatigue clearly places our existing troops in greater danger.
I doubt the anti-military activists in Berkeley stopped to think of that. Or perhaps they did and really just don't give a damn about our fighting men and women. How unpatriotic can these people get? How unappreciative and unsympathetic can these pious pacifists be toward the families of our troops? I say let's send a bus load of Southern parents of military servicemen out to Berkeley to confront the protesters. We can put it on pay-per-view and watch the melee. Enough patriotic Americans would pay to watch that we could probably pay off the national debt.
Americans should be outraged at the antics of these asinine people in Berkeley. No one is forcing them to stay here and enjoy their freedoms. If they are so impassioned by their cause why don't they move to a country where military recruiting by the government is not an issue?
I'll tell you why. Because they know their anti-military, anti-government sentiment would not be tolerated anywhere else in the world (except Europe). The militia would show up and these people would never be heard from again.
Maybe Governor Schwarzenegger should exclude Berkeley from the protection of the California National Guard. Then when these wealthy, white, middle-aged liberals are overrun by illegal immigrants, terrorism, and crime, and no longer funded by State and Federal funds, they can learn to defend themselves with their pretty pink signs.
Maybe then they'll learn to appreciate what defending freedom and national unity is all about.
Berkeley ain't worth a pound of chum!
The Fighting Fish "Oy!"
Wednesday, 30 January 2008
-
The Grandparent Effect
Do you remember how much we enjoyed visiting Grandma and Grandpa when we were little? For most of us our Grandparents held us in high regard—we were their little angels—we could almost do no wrong. Wasn’t it great!
They would spoil us, coddle us, encourage us, and sometimes even defend us from being disciplined too harshly by our parents. One might slip us a few dollar bills to spend at the dime store or give us the snack mom and dad would never allow. It was almost as if grandma and grandpa thought we were more precious than our parents, who were their own children. It’s pretty cool when mom or dad has to listen to grandma and grandpa!
Unlike the Butterfly Effect, this is not a story about traveling back into the past to change the outcome of the future. It’s not about how an insignificant occurrence halfway around the world causes a chain of events starting a catastrophe. It’s a real life example that looks forward at how we as parents might improve the outcome-of-life with our children by looking back into our past at the people who always seemed to make things better—our grandparents.
I believe that our childhood recollections may not be an abstraction of truth. I have observed through the years that grandparents often treat grandchildren much better, or at least much differently, than they did their own children. How did we as grandchildren become so much more cherished than our parents? More importantly, can we as parents become more like our grandparents were to us? I believe we can.
I also wonder how it can be that my mom and dad’s memories of grandma and grandpa are so different than my own. My mother spoke of a father who she recalls was an angry, drinking womanizer. But her father, the grandpa I grew up knowing, was the gentlest, most easy going person I’ve ever known. He never displayed anything but the utmost love and respect towards my grandmother. He occasionally indulged in a tipple of brandy, but never remotely imbibed the way my mother recalls, at least not around me. I’ve often wondered what happened to him between the time he was her dad and my grandfather. What caused the Grandparent Effect?
One of life’s unexpected turns has given me some perspective on why grandma and grandpa were so much different than when they were as parents. I, now in my early 40’s, am happily living in my second (and final) marriage. My wife, Amy, and I have a beautiful and bright 4 year old daughter named Emma. Emma was no accident. In fact, we often tell of how she was the most planned child in the history of the world. For six years we prepared our lives and careers anticipating Emma’s arrival. In 2003 that day finally arrived and life with her gets better every day.
But Emma is not my only child. I have a fantastic son, Ryan, who is twenty years old and his sister, my first daughter, Lindsay, who is going on eighteen, and is as bright as she is beautiful. Both of them are great kids from my first marriage to their mother, Wendy. Wendy and I were married just as I entered the Marines at age nineteen. A year later Wendy and I decided to start a family and Ryan was soon on his way. But the difference between Ryan’s father and Emma’s father is night and day. Same man, different dad.
Many people seem surprised when they realize the age difference between Ryan and Lindsay and Emma. We usually get the, “Oh, was Emma an oops?” Amy and I smile and tell them the story of how more planning went in the birth of Emma than did the Invasion at Normandy. As much as I love all my children equally for their own unique personalities, I admittedly am a much different father to Emma than I was to Ryan and Lindsay. It is something that is obvious to me on a conscious, daily level, and is equally apparent to Ryan and Lindsay as well.
I’m sure that Ryan and Lindsay have noticed the difference in my demeanor and wondered if I might love Emma more than I do them. I don’t of course, but it’s rational to ask since I am such a different person now than I was when they were Emma’s age fifteen years ago. Understanding enough about myself to intelligently talk about this subject with Ryan and Lindsay is very important to me. So much so, that I have spent a great deal of time comparing and contrasting myself between then and now. And there are a few conclusions on which I have settled.
Perhaps the biggest is my appreciation and value of life. In practical terms my life is really half over. Several people I know personally who are my age or younger have died, and our parents are now the oldest generation in our families. In my teens life seemed as if would last forever. I was indestructible, daring, a risk taker, afraid of absolutely nothing. Life was all about me. In my twenties life was still mostly about me. I began to interact with the world more, but was not mature enough, not fully capable, to selflessly put the needs and consideration of others completely before me—including my kids’.
Well, I’m not more different, I am completely changed. It’s now apparent to me that life is really short. And giving to others is what makes life the most rewarding. Sitting at the mid-point in my life, I look in both directions, backwards and forwards, hoping to make the next forty years better from the lessons I’ve learned. I’m bound and determined not to make the same mistakes twice, especially with Emma. I now have an appreciation of how fragile life really is, how terrible we can really be to each other, and how much value and meaning one person can bring into the lives of so many (or conversely, how much misery). I remember these same words and actions echoing my grandparents' sentiments.
Close behind came a change in me that I thought I’d never live to see—patience. I’m no saint yet, but I’ve learned to take a lot of crap. For me it isn’t that I simply learned to be more patient; I believe I wasn’t developmentally capable of a high degree of patience until I was older and into my thirties. It is undoubtedly unique for everybody as we are each affected differently by our environment and personal development. But generally, I believe that there is an age continuum that applies to each of us limiting our capacity for patience and maturity. The older we get, the greater our capacity for patience—to a point.
How I would have handled Ryan or Lindsay dawdling along when we were trying to leave the house is much different than how I handle Emma’s extreme pokiness today. Shockingly, I have even managed to make fun of her tortoise-like pace. The change in my capacity for patience has had a tremendous positive affect on the quality of my life and undeniably on Emma’s as well. No child like’s to constantly be hurried along or hastily scolded because mommy and daddy have some other priority on their mind. For me, the ability to exude patience is an extrinsic factor necessary for the quality development of my child’s life, more than it is an intrinsic need for my personal gratification. My grandparents were never in a hurry to do anything. They always moved at my pace. Like them, we only go as fast as Emma can handle. Which brings me to my next point—selflessness.
Selflessness is another critical characteristic that makes the Grandparent Effect possible. My memories of being a young parent, like that of so many I talk to, are filled with recollections of being mostly concerned with what I felt I needed to do; certainly not to the extreme that I would leave my children at home alone to go dancing. But rather a pervasive mis-focus of what’s truly important in everyday life. What I wanted to do often took precedence over what I probably should have been doing for my children instead. I should have spent less time worrying about friends, less time going out, and less time working, and more time playing with my children. My grandparents always had time for me. I always make time for Emma. A value I understand as part of the Grandparent Effect, but not one I could understand as a young parent.
Today, whenever Amy and I decide to do most anything, we stop and consider first the affect it will have on Emma: is she too tired, is it too cold, is she feeling snuggly. Sometimes she would rather stay home and cuddle on the couch than go to the store. So we stay home and cuddle. I am so deeply moved by a stolen moment to hold Emma in my arms, stroke her face, and tell her how much she means to me and mommy.
Looking back on the time since Ryan and Lindsay were small, it’s apparent to me now that we have so little time with them when they are little-people. We do not have much time left when Emma will want to be a cuddle-bug, so I take every opportunity and am thankful for every chance. My grandparents were much the same way. It didn’t matter where we were going or what we were doing, their focus always seemed to be on being there for us when we needed it.
Now, I am not necessarily old for a first-grader’s parent. I am older than most, but I certainly don’t look or act like a grandparent. I’m not ready for that. In fact I’ve told Ryan and Lindsay that if they change my name to grandpa before I’m ready—I’m gonna… What clearly sets Amy and I apart from most all the parents of Emma’s peers, is that we are about ten years older. We have also lived greatly and experienced much beyond our ten years seniority. What otherwise troubles many of the young parents, we seldom give much thought. I see many of the younger parents exhibiting the same behaviors I once exhibited: too little patience, too much self-focus, and an attitude as if life is going to last forever—it doesn’t, ask any grandparent, ask me. I sadly see many of these children becoming exactly what they live.
What I’ve come to believe is that my experience is the Grandparent Effect. It’s the appreciation and respect that can only come from experiencing more of life before taking responsibility to try and guide another. I see myself as my grandparents, only I am lucky to still be the parent. Statistically, Emma is likely to be ahead of her peer group. She is the only (household) child of a seasoned, married, professional couple who are educated and mature. She is certainly academically ahead of her classmates. Already she reads, writes, adds and has a remarkable vocabulary which she can effectively articulate. True, she is around adults a lot and probably has an advantage being nurtured in that environment. But she also spends time at school each day and with friends regularly. She is socially well adjusted and is very much a four year old girl, princess dresses and all.
But what is most important to Amy and me, more than all of those skills, is that Emma is emotionally strong and has a healthy self-image. Emotionally strong and emotionally-intelligent children typically become the most healthy, happy, and productive adults. They are less likely to enter into bad relationships and less likely to lose their way as young adults. I believe that Emma’s emotional strength comes from our behavior as parents who, in effect, act and feel more like grandparents. We embody behavior that brings with it a healthy respect for the brevity and value of life, patience to let the unbridled whims of childhood serve their purpose, and a spirit of selflessness that shows her that nothing is more important to us than her. It’s exactly the way I felt with my grandparents, and we are so fortunate to experience this as parents. But Emma is the true benefactor.
Waiting a little later in life to have Emma has brought more blessings than we could have ever thought possible.
Unfortunately, I cannot go back and undo the past with Ryan and Lindsay. My mission with then now is to try and impart the meaningful lessons I’ve learned—like the Grandparent Effect—in hopes they will have a richer experience with their children and as parents. If anyone ever asks me about our choice to wait to have Emma, I share with them the Grandparent Effect. It seldom happens, but if they offer any doubt, if they scoff at our view, I introduce them to Emma—she’s all the proof they’ll ever need.
Swim Against the Current
The Fighting Fish "Oy!"
Wednesday, 23 January 2008
-
Ignorance Defends Obesity
Original Post by writejaywrite on January 17, 2008
Call me Chubbie
The blogger writes in the above link (Call me Chubbie) about how he is shocked and appalled at the boot camp style methods of Michael Karolchyk's health club called the Anti-gym. ( http://www.theantigym.com ) The uneducated diatribe from the idiomasses lamenting the plight of the pudgy was so ridiculous it was necessary for the fighting fish to enter the ring and knock some sense into them. I've heard it said that it's better to be fat than stupid. Fat people have the Anti-gym, but stupid is as stupid does. This is just another case in point.
The Fighting Fish Had to Say...
Jay,
Are you really serious?
Are you truly indignant with Michael Karolchyk for not suffering the chubbies?
Wake up and shake off the pretentious BS. I’d rather hock loogies at telephone poles than spend my time having to defend the misunderstood, but your tunnel-visionary myopia about Karolchyk’s heresy has forced me off my ass and onto the soapbox.
First, what most everyone seems to be ignoring is that Michael's methods have been successfully tried and tested for over 230 years. So here I am, saddled with the dubious task of educating Americans who clearly hate others’ freedom. Never has there been a better example of personal accountability and successful rebuilding of an individual's body and spirit like the methods used by the US Marines, which Michael Karolchyk is merely privatizing.
Second, generalizing is a mistake of megaton-sized proportions. It's only common sense that this type of discipline is not for everyone. If folks don't like what Michael has to say and are offended, don't tune in and don't join. And save the self-righteous, indignant and uneducated commentaries for the smoke filled coffee houses and weekly at-home church meetings.
Blubbering about the unfortunate fatties on a global forum like Xanga does more to tell the entire world we are a bunch of weak, self-indulgent pampered asses than it does to raise an awareness of some egalitarian fitness conspiracy aimed at helpless victims of self-proclaimed fat genes.
Resistance to Karolchyk’s message is the ultimate litmus test proving it's based in truth. Deep down inside in places where you (and they) don't talk about, you know it's the truth. You act like the offended chubbies are Third World Stop the Huger poster babies who were somehow forced into a pathetic miserable life and the outspoken fit are to blame.
Fact, not feelings, is where accountability begins. And until chubbies put themselves in a position to be broken down both physically and mentally the odds of winning over their condition is unlikely. If all you can focus on is hurt feelings and cupcake tossing, you've missed the larger picture.
Fork-in-mouth disease and super-sized portions of everything you eat certainly can’t be to blame for these poor bacon-addled scapegoats--can they? But you don't have to believe me; our national statistics on the health crisis prove it.
What about these arteriosclerotic children waddling around shaped like early models of the A-bomb, with their pale flabby legs jiggling under the summer sun? Some states have embraced these cherubs and made it illegal to spank them while the ACLU would have us believe that discipline violates a child's rights. If these models of social perfection are a protected class, why would laws protecting them from unhealthy lifestyles forced upon them by their parents be so out of the question?
Raising a child to be fat, unhealthy and unattractive demoralizes a child as much and lasts just as long as being sexually abused. So why should stuffing a child with lard-laden deep fried fatty food be treated with impunity? Where's the logic, where's the common sense? Oh, I remember, logic was overtaken by emotional self interest.
I say, "when in doubt, blame the parents." Most parents don't want to be socially accountable for their children-that's the cold harsh truth. I say if parents won’t assume responsibility, then legislate it.
Parents have a choice. And if a parent chooses to give a child crappy food, putting the child's health at risk, why should there not be accountability for the parent? Throw the parents in the pokey and force them to consume plenty of artery-clogging fixens during their stay. Maybe then they’ll get perspective about how their fattened unhealthy children (who grow up to be fat, unhealthy adults with loads of health problems) turn into a social burden to all of us -- including you -- my appalled self-righteous blogger.
But hey, perhaps you are okay with the social and economical health care burdens as long as the chubbie's feelings aren't hurt. Me…I think I’d rather someone hurl insults at them until they thin out or give up.
Don’t get hooked by your own BS!
The Fighting Fish "Oy!"
- browse entries:
- older »


